<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So what does “’hands on help from&#8217; experienced people” actually mean?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bobsbigblueblog.wordpress.com/2008/06/19/so-what-does-%e2%80%9c%e2%80%99hands-on-help-from-experienced-people%e2%80%9d-actually-mean/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bobsbigblueblog.wordpress.com/2008/06/19/so-what-does-%e2%80%9c%e2%80%99hands-on-help-from-experienced-people%e2%80%9d-actually-mean/</link>
	<description>You've reached Bob's Big Blue Blog. Here you will find all of the news and views you can use or abuse related to the advertising industry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 21:05:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christian Valaitis</title>
		<link>http://bobsbigblueblog.wordpress.com/2008/06/19/so-what-does-%e2%80%9c%e2%80%99hands-on-help-from-experienced-people%e2%80%9d-actually-mean/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Valaitis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobsbigblueblog.wordpress.com/?p=77#comment-232</guid>
		<description>Aren&#039;t advertising&#039;s halcyon days inexorably linked to the fact that agencies once were PRIVATE and not PUBLIC concerns? 

I operate (with extreme naivety) in a fog over how the BUSINESS of advertising works, having spent 20+ years on the creative side. Yet within my current condition of curmudgeon-dry (just made that word up) I keep wondering if things weren&#039;t better in the DAYS OF YORE? The problem is most everything seems as if it was better in the rear-view mirror. 

I&#039;ve recently re-jiggered from my once perq-laden, title-heavy, lofty status. I now do work on a shoestring and a prayer. I miss the PAY CHECK (and the First Class airline seat) but that&#039;s about all. This NEW WORLD ORDER is kind of a back-to-basics approach, not as detached and distant as it formerly was. My hunch is you feel the same? It&#039;s a much healthier CLIENT/AGENCY/CONSUMER vortex. It&#039;s much easier to create, shape, direct work when one is &quot;HANDS ON.&quot;  In my previous life my judgments weren&#039;t shaped solely by the ON-HAND data, but often by the metrics of previous projects, which was expedient but unprofessional.

For a refresher course on advertising (as it should be) I went on YouTube and watched
Leo Burnett&#039;s farewell speech. Never had the pleasure to work for him, or around him, but when I watch him I&#039;m struck by how antithetical he his to the caricature of those in his profession.

Could he even get HIRED today?

Could his ethos thrive in today&#039;s environs?

Can an ethically driven, work-centric agency make it in 2008 and beyond?

I&#039;m skeptically curious?

Christian V.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#8217;t advertising&#8217;s halcyon days inexorably linked to the fact that agencies once were PRIVATE and not PUBLIC concerns? </p>
<p>I operate (with extreme naivety) in a fog over how the BUSINESS of advertising works, having spent 20+ years on the creative side. Yet within my current condition of curmudgeon-dry (just made that word up) I keep wondering if things weren&#8217;t better in the DAYS OF YORE? The problem is most everything seems as if it was better in the rear-view mirror. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve recently re-jiggered from my once perq-laden, title-heavy, lofty status. I now do work on a shoestring and a prayer. I miss the PAY CHECK (and the First Class airline seat) but that&#8217;s about all. This NEW WORLD ORDER is kind of a back-to-basics approach, not as detached and distant as it formerly was. My hunch is you feel the same? It&#8217;s a much healthier CLIENT/AGENCY/CONSUMER vortex. It&#8217;s much easier to create, shape, direct work when one is &#8220;HANDS ON.&#8221;  In my previous life my judgments weren&#8217;t shaped solely by the ON-HAND data, but often by the metrics of previous projects, which was expedient but unprofessional.</p>
<p>For a refresher course on advertising (as it should be) I went on YouTube and watched<br />
Leo Burnett&#8217;s farewell speech. Never had the pleasure to work for him, or around him, but when I watch him I&#8217;m struck by how antithetical he his to the caricature of those in his profession.</p>
<p>Could he even get HIRED today?</p>
<p>Could his ethos thrive in today&#8217;s environs?</p>
<p>Can an ethically driven, work-centric agency make it in 2008 and beyond?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m skeptically curious?</p>
<p>Christian V.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
